Currently:
- Feeling: sleepy
- Listening to: Emiliana Torrini - Sunny road
- Thinking about: a discussion we had in class today
- Reading: Junky by W.S. Burroughs
I am revolted. I’ve told my friends many times that I’m a revolted human being, but only today did I realise that I really am one. When I hear somebody talking crap I just can’t help myself and I tell him what I think of that subject. Or when I see somebody acting stupid, again, I can’t shut up and revolt against such a moron attitude. So, yeah, I’m revolted. But that doesn’t mean I can’t accept comments and opinions, which are not similar to mine. But not that’s not the point I’m trying to make here.
Instead of the Latin teacher came a nice looking lady who was a sort of family counsel. This lady wanted to tell us more about marriage and relationships. It sounded like fun so everyone was very attentive. She asked us what we expect our lovers to be like and all kind of questions. There are 2 girls in my class whom are known to be very religious. I believe in God and I like going to church and all that stuff, but they are a bit more into this than most of us, if you know what I mean. *and I’m sure you know :)*
Finally, the trickiest question of all came: ‘Now, tell me what do you think of sex before marriage?’ Although I’m not very into this sex business and I have other colleagues who have boyfriends and active sexual relationships, I was the one to say ‘I totally agree with it’. There were a few moments of silence in the classroom and then the normal buzz and noise. Of course, the class divided into two parts: the ones who thought sex before marriage was ok and the ones who were against it. Like I’ve said, I can accept other opinions and ideas, but as long as the person doesn’t try to convince me that his/her idea is the best. Ok, dude, I got it: you think that, I think this, we don’t agree on this one, but don’t try to make me think like you do. You know, we live in a democratic country: freedom of speech and thought is allowed, so let me think and speak for myself.
What actually revolted me big time were 2 ideas.
- After some debate on this subject, the nice lady said something like this: ‘Yeah, but don’t you think that if you have sex before marriage, when you’ll get to have sex with your husband and he’ll realise you’re not a virgin, won’t he feel disappointed and ask himself how many men you had before him?’
Dude, that sucked. I mean, come on, how can she believe that if two people are having a serious relationship, they don’t know about each others ex-partners and sexual relationships and they get married, spend the wedding night together and boom, only then does he find out that she’s not a virgin anymore. Now that’s completely idiotic.
- One of those very religious colleagues of mine made this statement: ‘Boys want to have sex and whey they ask a girl to have sex with them and she says yes, then they consider her a whore. If she says no, then they don’t like her anymore.’
Ooook… I understand that she wants to be ‘pure’ when she marries, but to make such a statement, it’s a bit too much. And, God, was she convinced when she said that!
I really don’t get it. Why is this fuss about not having sex before marriage??? Come one, do you actually believe that boys can remain virgins until then? I truly doubt that. So what’s the point of you, as a girl, remaining a virgin, when your husband won’t be one? Michael Foucault said that the society is like a system with a certain structure, structure which changes with the epoch. So, if in the 18th or 19th century the structure said that girls had to be virgins in order to be considered decent girls and in order to be able to get married, everyone knew that men had all the women they wanted before getting married and even after that. And I think this is totally wrong. Why say a woman is a whore if she had previous sexual relationships and consider this something normal when it comes to men. But we’re not living in those centuries, for crying out loud. We’re in the 21st century and no one expects of you to be a virgin when you marry, not even the one you marry. The structure of the system has changed. I don’t have anything against the people who want to be virgins when they marry, but from what I saw today in class, those people are kind of narrow-minded.
I really don’t think my parents hadn’t had sex before they got married. Probably my father was my mum’s first man and he’ll be her one and last, but I really, really don’t think they waited 3 or 4 years before having sex, especially when they were living in Bucharest, far away from their parents.
Don’t get me wrong. I’m not saying that sleeping with a lot of people is ok, or having one-night stands, which involve sex, is all right, but when you’re in a relationship and you love and trust your partner, sex is something normal. Of course the Church doesn’t allow such kind of things, but that’s a risk you assume when you’re in a relationship. And if you’re not a religious person, well, you couldn’t even care less about what the Church condemns or not.
My point is that I really hate narrow-minded people and that I’m truly a revolted person. And about the sex before marriage part: I totally agree with it. So, come on, be honest and tell me what you think of this. I’m really curious to find out.
Oh, I had a pleasant surprise today. After that class we got together and talked the problem over. Guess what? A colleagues of mine, whom I call Ice Princes cause she doesn’t talk with the rest of us and she always has that superior air, said that she agrees with me. And she was sincere. Wow, that was something. She was the last girl from my class whom I’d thought would agree with me. That was a pleasant surprise.